/plaza/ - General/Random

The place to post!


New Reply[×]
Name
No-bump
Message
File 10MB total
Oekaki
Password
[New Reply]


Screen_Shot_2026-04-30_at_8.44.09_PM.png
[Hide] (2.6MB, 3369x2348)
I've re-enabled CRBAchan and restored all the posts lost in the raid. Further more, I've ensured this can never happen again.

CRBAchan: https://ib.crba.tw
CRBA Archive: https://crba.tw

I'm also looking to expand the CRBA site. One thing I want to do is create an immersive community experience that feels like the pure CRBA innocence. To do this, I'd a very intricate web design. *I am soliciting ideas for this.* Maybe we could have "CRBA mail" system where you can write letters within CRBA. It would very themed.

I've also been working on some concrete improvements and additions to the site. I've not released it yet, but plan to very soon. I plan to add the ability to view the CRBA art chronologically and in other ways. Additionally, I plan to improve the organization from the site and incorporate a text archive of things Sean has written. I've posted an example of this improved design as the image for this post. I also plan to add an archive of AVCHonline's videos and music.

Let me know if you have any ideas for creating the beautiful immersive innocence experiences!
what's the point of this chan
>>9585
To spread the cult of Sean, he's pretty explicit about this
>>9585
The purpose is to engage in the innocent beauty of an eternal past where time does not exist and everything exists all at once in an infinite number of ethereal spatial dimensions.

It's to partake in the beautiful fractal that is the camaraderie and pure innocence that is CRBA.

To understand this, you begin your CRBA journey. Start by staring at the CRBA artwork while listening to something that catalyzes the journey of self. Within thirty matters, all worldly matters will fade away completely. After a few hours, you will completely understand.
>>9585
Mental illness, just filter and report
>>9592
You are misguided. I hope you are able to see the light of CRBA eventually.
>>9594
Stop spamming. We have told you many times you are breaking the rules.
>>9595
No you haven't?? In none of these threads has anyone complained. Are you the admin or a wannabe?
>>9595
>>9598
Previous threads:
https://web.archive.org/web/20251217235250/https://marzichan.org/plaza/thread/3365.html
https://web.archive.org/web/20250924022717/https://marzichan.org/plaza/thread/5824.html#5824
https://web.archive.org/web/20251129220621/https://marzichan.org/plaza/thread/5875.html#5875
https://web.archive.org/web/20251217170726/https://marzichan.org/plaza/thread/6238.html#6238
https://marzichan.org/plaza/thread/8274.html#8274
>>9599
This is exactly what you need to stop doing. Making repeated threads about the same topic and posting them across several imageboards all at once is spamming. You only come here to spam and don't have any interest in the other conversations here. Please understand that the threads you're making are considered rude and unwelcome. Other imageboards would appreciate it if you stopped spamming them too.
>>9601
>don't have any interest in the other conversations here
I do. Again, are you an admin or not?
>>9602
It doesn't matter whether I'm an admin or not, your breach of rules and common sense etiquette is so obvious that everyone except you can see it (thanks to your "neurodivergence" and unfamiliarity with imageboard culture). It's particularly rude that you made a new thread when your previous spam thread hadn't even died yet.

This is a slow imageboard so your spam is disruptive. This also allows me to say confidently that no, you don't post in any of the other threads here (or on the other sites you spam), you only come here to spam.
>>9603
>It doesn't matter whether I'm an admin or not
It does because what you're doing is pointless backseat moderation.
>thanks to your "neurodivergence"
A stupid word.
>This also allows me to say confidently that no, you don't post in any of the other threads here (or on the other sites you spam), you only come here to spam.
I actually do. You would be able to find that out if you were actually an admin.
>It's particularly rude that you made a new thread when your previous spam thread hadn't even died yet.
Four month old thread on a completely different topic.
>>9604
So you know you're breaking the rules. Why would anyone want to visit your website if you approach them in bad faith?

>Four month old thread on a completely different topic.
Your other thread >>8274 links to the same website and discusses the same topic. You realize you linked it above and everyone can read it? Why lie?

This is all beside the point that the subject matter of your posts is meaningless copypasted nonsense. No one wants to read this shit, go away.
movie-time-movie.gif
[Hide] (108.6KB, 220x164)
>>9605
>So you know you're breaking the rules
??? When did I say that?
>Why would anyone want to visit your website if you approach them in bad faith?
I'm not - I'm trying to share a personal project that I feel deeply about.
>Your other thread >>8274 links to the same website and discusses the same topic. You realize you linked it above and everyone can read it? Why lie?
That thread was about a specific update and was from four months ago and got little. This thread is from today and is about a much bigger update and is specifically open to a type of feedback I stated. Why should I make someone scroll through an unrelated, dead thread instead of just making a new post?
>This is all beside the point that the subject matter of your posts is meaningless copypasted nonsense. No one wants to read this shit, go away.
It is not meaningless. If you believe to be meaningless, then I have failed to convey my feeling adequately. And for that, I am sorry.
>>9607
>I'm trying to share a personal project that I feel deeply about.
Your "sharing" is actually onesided attention seeking because your website is not interesting to anyone, people gave you a small amount of attention out of vague disinterest and pity. Kind of like a kid showing their parents crayon drawings except you're an adult man. That's why your site has zero regular users.

You have failed to convey your feelings adequately, your website is unappealing and uninteresting. But even if it had some kind of merit, that wouldn't make it okay to spam multiple imageboards like you have done.
If you really still don't understand what you did wrong: How about you post your website updates in the art thread (>>8315), and only post on ONE imageboard for each update? That's what a reasonable person familiar with imageboard etiquette would do.

>Why should I make someone scroll through an unrelated, dead thread
In case you didn't know, most people who visit slow boards regularly use the index page to see new posts and would not miss your post even if it was at the bottom of an old thread.
>>9608
It is not my artwork, I am sharing someone else artwork which I love. How is that "attention seeking"?
>>9609
Ever heard of "necroposting". There's no reason at all to post an a four-month old thread that has nothing relevant to the current post other than linking to the website once.
>and only post on ONE imageboard for each update?
I frequent multiple imageboards and see things regularly posted on more than one of them. Have you considered that different imageboards may have overlapping interests?
>>9624
>I frequent multiple imageboards and see things regularly posted on more than one of them.
And here's an example of just that I was able to find: >>7880
A quick google search indicates that this was posted to many imageboards: https://www.google.com/search?q=%22mokyudex%22&udm=web
And google does not index most imageboard posts, so there is probably more.
>>9601
> You only come here to spam and don't have any interest in the other conversations here.

I believe that's just one of those ambiguous homestuck fans that show themselves once in a while. I think they do have some interest in konversing here.

>>9624
>It is not my artwork, I am sharing someone else artwork which I love.

I'd say this also fits into the thread anon referenced.

>>9609
I doubt anybody's watching CRBAzin's threads at all. I suppose, anybody who's really interested in all that is already on their chan, so both of you sort of wrong and sort of right. Speaking for myself, I don't mind seeing a single post at the top of the board about some chan just once in 4 months. . .
>>9630
>I believe that's just one of those ambiguous homestuck fans that show themselves once in a while.
yeah, the megidoBULLIES >:(
>>9624
>Ever heard of "necroposting". There's no reason at all to post an a four-month old thread that has nothing relevant to the current post other than linking to the website once.
No one cares about necroposting here and people do it regularly, which you would know if you actually used this site rather than drive by posting spam advertisments on a bunch of sites listed on allchans.org.

>I frequent multiple imageboards and see things regularly posted on more than one of them.
Yeah, that's obnoxious and people are tired of that. >>7880 is also unappreciated spam and I'm not sure why you'd think it isn't.
dooku_react.gif
[Hide] (3.3MB, 498x280)
[New Reply]
23 replies | 3 files
Connecting...
Show Post Actions

Actions:

Captcha: